Big changes have come to Genealogy.com — all content is now read-only, and member subscriptions and the Shop have been discontinued.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Regional: U.S. States: North Carolina: Franklin County

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Bastardy Bonds - General or Specific Information - Smith
Posted by: Deloris Williams (ID *****4503) Date: September 20, 2008 at 00:31:17
In Reply to: Bastardy Bonds - General or Specific Information - Smith by Kerrie Smith Cornett of 612

Kerrie,

If a woman had a child out of wedlock in North Carolina, she was required to name the father so that he would support the child. If she chose not to name him in court, then she had to name 3 men who would help pay fo the childs needs. Sometimes one of those 3 men might
be the father; otherwise, they were usually members of her family, her father, a brother, etc. The county did not want to be responsible for the care and upbringing of any illegitimate children.

Another good description is frm Sue
Ashby on the Chatham Co. US Genweb site:
BASTARDY BONDS:

If a woman became pregnant and had no husband or her husband denied the child (that didn't happen often) then she was called into court and asked to name the father of the child. If she named the father, then he was called into court and required to post a "bastardy bond", giving security to the county court, that the child would be supported by him, for a certain period of time. He would have to pay the mother for the "laying in" time. (she would not be able to earn a living during the time of birth and afterwards) and many times these young women
were indentured servants, so the money would be paid to her 'Master" for the time he would be without her services as his servant. Then, her time would be extended, etc.

If she refused to name the father, (and that happened more than you would think), the woman's family or friends would post bond for the same reason. The county court did not want to have an indigent woman and child to have to feed at
county expense. Often, the child would be bound out as soon as it was weaned. A family would take in it to raise and get a servant at the same time, with very little expenditure on their part.
In the very early days of the colony the woman would be taken to the town square and be whipped and left at the stocks for her to be pelted with rotten fruit, etc., for her sins. And, in many places, the purported father was also fined and made to wear a white or other colored smock, that branded him a 'fornicator'. I don't think I've ever read where he was whipped, however..

A number of the County websites have Bastardy Bonds posted, and in case you are interested in some of these other counties here are a few:

http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ncchatha/bastardy.htm
Chatham Co.

http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ncnash/base.htm
Nash Co.

http://www.ncgenweb.us/ncgranville/other/bas-bond.htm
Granville Co.

http://www.ncgenweb.us/ncwarren/misc/bastardy-1779-1868.htm
Warren Co.



Deloris Williams


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/nc/franklin/messages/449.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network